<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Meshio.com - Latest Comments in KWSP Declares 4.5% Dividend for 2008</title><link>http://meshio.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://meshio.disqus.com/kwsp_declares_45_dividend_for_2008/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:30:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: KWSP Declares 4.5% Dividend for 2008</title><link>http://www.meshio.com/2009/03/kwsp-declares-45-dividend-for-2008/#comment-7615818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Provided that the risk taken commensurate with the returns. Using the OPR as the index is not exactly a sound benchmark. Maybe a mixture of KLCI and KLIBOR with considerations on age bands and account types would make a better benchmark.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the returns all these years don't really tell you much about KWSP's actual investment activities. I would prefer a tad more transparency anytime.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yowchuan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KWSP Declares 4.5% Dividend for 2008</title><link>http://www.meshio.com/2009/03/kwsp-declares-45-dividend-for-2008/#comment-7488711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Look at the bright side at least the 4.5% dividend declared by EPF is better then Fixed Deposit Rate. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Horlic </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KWSP Declares 4.5% Dividend for 2008</title><link>http://www.meshio.com/2009/03/kwsp-declares-45-dividend-for-2008/#comment-7372295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rescue mission codenamed- C.R.O.N.Y.?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yowchuan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KWSP Declares 4.5% Dividend for 2008</title><link>http://www.meshio.com/2009/03/kwsp-declares-45-dividend-for-2008/#comment-7306024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not so bad lioa lah,, they must save some money for rescu mission ma,, if you know what i mean?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eugene</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:27:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KWSP Declares 4.5% Dividend for 2008</title><link>http://www.meshio.com/2009/03/kwsp-declares-45-dividend-for-2008/#comment-7305971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting post. &lt;br&gt;By international standard, 4.5% return for 2008 sound pretty good. Even considering low risk investments. So KWSP apparently held itself pretty well...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's more worrying is your opening at the end... And we are not the only one worrying:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13271348" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13271348"&gt;http://www.economist.com/di...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacques</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:23:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>